Florida Non-Binding Arbitration

—

This content is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal advice.

Florida courts encourage alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as a way to move cases toward resolution without the cost, delay, and uncertainty of trial. One of the tools in this system is non-binding arbitration.

Although less widely discussed than mediation, non-binding arbitration plays a distinct role in Florida’s alternative dispute resolution (ADR)  landscape. Understanding how it works — and how to prepare for it — can help attorneys, clients, and mediators make the most of the process.

What Is Non-Binding Arbitration?

In Florida, non-binding arbitration is a court-ordered or agreed-upon hearing where a neutral arbitrator (or panel) reviews evidence and issues a decision. Unlike binding arbitration, the arbitrator’s decision is not final unless both parties accept it.

• If neither side objects within the statutory time frame, the award can become enforceable.
• If a party rejects the award, the case proceeds to trial — but with potential cost-shifting consequences if the rejecting party does worse at trial than in arbitration.

Thus, while technically “non-binding,” the process creates strong incentives for parties to treat the hearing seriously.

Florida’s Framework for Nonbinding Arbitration

• Authority: Governed by Chapter 44, Florida Statutes, and local court rules.
• Application: Often used in civil cases (contract disputes, insurance claims, personal injury) where the court believes ADR could save judicial resources.
• Procedure:
  • Informal compared to trial — rules of evidence are relaxed.
  • Each party presents documents, witness testimony, or expert opinions.
  • Florida Arbitrator issues a written decision.
• Appeal/Trial Rights: Parties dissatisfied with the award may demand a trial de novo.

Why Parties Should Take It Seriously

Even though labeled “non-binding,” Florida Arbitration carries significant weight:

1. Cost Risks: Rejecting the award and doing worse at trial can trigger attorney’s fee and cost consequences.
2. Settlement Pressure: The Florida arbitrator’s decision often serves as a reality checkfor both sides.
3. Discovery Value: The process gives attorneys insight into how a neutral views the evidence.
4. Negotiation Leverage: The award can frame settlement talks.

Preparing for Non-Binding Florida Arbitration

Both attorneys and neutrals should promote good decision-making. In non-binding arbitration, that means:

• Documentation and Case Framing
  • Just as in mediation, organized documentation is the anchor. Presenting clear, credible records (contracts, damages evidence, expert reports) ensures the Florida arbitrator has a reliable factual base.
• Litigation Interest and Risk Assessment
  • The parties should analyze the likely court outcome, tangible litigation costs, and intangible costs (stress, delay, reputational harm) before Florida arbitration begins.
  • This helps the parties evaluate whether to accept the Florida arbitration result or roll the dice at trial.
• Client Counseling
  • Manage expectations: Florida arbitration is less formal than trial, but it still requires preparation.
  • Explain both the potential benefits (faster, cheaper, informative) and risks (cost penalties if rejecting award).

Common Pitfalls in Florida Non-Binding Arbitration

• Treating it as a “practice run”rather than a serious proceeding.
• Failing to prepare the partiesfor the possibility that the Florida arbitrator’s award will influence later settlement or litigation strategy.
• Inadequate documentation, leaving the Florida arbitrator with incomplete or unclear evidence.

Conclusion: A Bridge, Not a Dead End

Florida Non-Binding arbitration sits between mediation and trial. It is less flexible than mediation, but less final than binding arbitration or trial. Its greatest value may be in how it shapes parties’ expectations, narrows disputes, and supports settlement — if attorneys and clients prepare thoughtfully.

For practitioners, the lesson is clear: treat non-binding arbitration not as a procedural detour, but as a serious opportunity for evaluation and resolution. Done well, it can anchor realistic negotiations, reduce decision errors, and save parties the stress and expense of full litigation.

—

This content is brought to you by Hussain Ali

iStockPhoto

The post Florida Non-Binding Arbitration appeared first on The Good Men Project.

View the full article