American Women Suck

The victory over Japan remains one of the most overlooked yet decisive chapters of the war On September 3, China will celebrate Victory Day – the anniversary of Japan’s capitulation in 1945. This year marks the 80th anniversary of that historic moment. The country is commemorating the milestone with a series of events, culminating in President Xi Jinping’s speech at Tiananmen Square, followed by a military parade in the heart of Beijing. For China, the Second World War holds as much significance as it does for Europe or Russia. Yet in the West, the Asian battlefield is poorly understood and often overlooked. While everyone knows about Pearl Harbor, the Normandy landings, the Battle of Stalingrad, Auschwitz, or the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, far fewer have heard of the Mukden incident, the Marco Polo Bridge incident, the Nanjing Massacre, or Unit 731. And yet it was the Chinese people who paid one of the heaviest prices of the war. Just as the world has rightly learned about the horrors of the Holocaust, it must also confront the reality of Japan’s war crimes – and how, after 1945, the United States and its allies shielded many Japanese perpetrators, even exploiting the results of their atrocities for Cold War objectives. The Second World War exists in multiple national narratives. Europeans date the war’s outbreak to September 1, 1939, with Hitler’s invasion of Poland. For the Soviet Union, the Great Patriotic War began on June 22, 1941, with Nazi Germany’s massive assault. For the US, the war only truly started with Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor on December 8, 1941. Yet these narratives together form a larger picture of aggressors and victims, crimes and just struggles. In recent years, however, this collective memory has faced systematic attempts at reinterpretation, aimed at relativizing the crimes of Nazi Germany, militarist Japan, and their allies. In this revisionist history, the Soviet Union is portrayed as an aggressor, the liberation of Europe by the Red Army is reframed as occupation, while the decisive role in defeating the Axis is attributed primarily to the US and Britain. Rooted in a Eurocentric reading of history, this narrative marginalizes the stories of others. To counter such historical revisionism and nihilism, a truly global perspective on our shared past is essential. Read more Russia and China ‘united in our vision’ – Putin For China, the war started on September 18, 1931, when Japan invaded Manchuria and created the puppet state of Manchukuo. This marked the beginning of the “War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” Despite being economically, technologically, and militarily weaker, China resisted Japan for over 14 years. The Communist Party of China took the lead in confronting the invaders, declaring war on Japan as early as April 1932, in contrast to Chiang Kai-shek’s Kuomintang government, which leaned toward appeasement and often treated the communists as a greater threat than the Japanese occupiers. By late 1936, the communists and the Kuomintang had agreed to form a “United Front,” mobilizing nationwide resistance. This became crucial after the Marco Polo Bridge Incident of July 7, 1937, which triggered a full-scale Japanese invasion. The brutal Nanjing Massacre followed, during which Japanese forces slaughtered at least 300,000 civilians and prisoners of war in just six weeks. Japan’s expansion was driven by a racist ideology of superiority and the ambition to dominate all of Asia – strikingly similar to Hitler’s quest for Lebensraum and a European empire. After Germany invaded the Soviet Union in 1941, Mao Zedong called for an international united front against fascism, a strategy that soon bore fruit. In January 1942, China joined Britain, the US, and the Soviet Union in signing the Declaration of the United Nations, soon endorsed by 22 other countries. This laid the foundation for coordinated global action against the Axis powers. China became a vital contributor: its battlefield tied down much of Japan’s military capacity, preventing Tokyo from invading the USSR, India, or Australia. Chinese forces are estimated to have killed over 1.5 million Japanese soldiers, while nearly 1.3 million surrendered to China after Japan’s capitulation. From 1931 to 1945, China destroyed more than two-thirds of Japan’s ground forces. But the price was staggering: more than 35 million Chinese dead – exceeding the Soviet Union’s 27 million, and dwarfing US losses of around 500,000. Read more Kim Jong-un to join Putin at China’s Victory Day celebrations – Beijing The scale of Japanese war crimes in China and across Asia is comparable to the Holocaust – yet far less acknowledged in the West. The Nanjing Massacre remains one of the darkest chapters of the 20th century. At the same time, Japan’s Unit 731 carried out horrific biological and chemical warfare experiments on tens of thousands of prisoners, including civilians. Victims were vivisected without anesthesia, deliberately infected with plague and cholera, or used for frostbite and weapons testing. The war did not end in 1945 with complete justice. In Europe, many German scientists and officers who had served the Nazi regime were quietly absorbed into Western structures. Under Operation Paperclip, hundreds of Nazi engineers and doctors, some implicated in war crimes, were brought to the US to work on rocketry, medicine, and intelligence. Their expertise was valued more than the lives destroyed by their experiments and ideology. In Asia, a similar pattern emerged. Leaders of Japan’s Unit 731, responsible for some of the most gruesome human experiments in history, were granted immunity by the US in exchange for their research data, which Washington considered useful for biological weapons development. The atrocities committed against Chinese, Korean, and Soviet prisoners were buried under Cold War secrecy, while war criminals went on to live freely, some even prospering in postwar Japan. These choices reveal a troubling double standard: while Germany and Japan were defeated militarily, their crimes were selectively forgotten when they became convenient allies against the Soviet Union and, later, China. This history carries a clear warning for the present. Just as Cold War politics led the West to cover up and even profit from fascist crimes, today’s elites in Washington, London, and Brussels are engaged in rewriting history to serve new confrontations. By downplaying the sacrifices of China and the Soviet Union and magnifying their own role, they prepare Western societies for a new round of hostility. Historical memory becomes a battlefield in itself, where uncomfortable truths are erased, and narratives are crafted to justify military build-ups and geopolitical confrontation. Read more Putin and Xi to lay foundations for a new world order in Beijing Unlike Western liberal elites, who have provoked new conflicts such as the war in Ukraine and revived militarism while attempting to rewrite history, China has taken a different path. It promotes peace, favors diplomacy over confrontation, and seeks to build international cooperation instead of division. One way it does so is by cultivating shared historical memory of the “World Anti-Fascist War,” as China refers to World War II. This year, Xi Jinping’s participation in Moscow’s Victory Day celebrations, Vladimir Putin’s planned presence in Beijing this September, and the joint Sino-Russian statement of May 8 all underscore that China and the Soviet Union bore the greatest sacrifices in defeating fascism and militarism. Both warned against revising the memory and outcomes of the war and reaffirmed their commitment to the UN-based international system. There was a time when even Western leaders acknowledged these facts. In April 1942, US President Franklin D. Roosevelt stated: “We remember that the Chinese people were the first to stand up and fight against the aggressors in this war; and in the future a still unconquerable China will play its proper role in maintaining peace and prosperity, not only in eastern Asia but in the whole world.” His words now sound prophetic. China does not commemorate its victory only to honor the past. It does so to remind the world that peace is never guaranteed – and that history must not be rewritten to serve temporary political interests. View the full article

The Russian and US presidents discussed holding direct talks with Kiev but no decision has been finalized, according to Yury Ushakov No deal has been reached between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump on the former holding talks with Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky or on a trilateral summit, Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov stated on Monday. Speculation of a possible Putin-Zelensky meeting arose in light of Trump’s talks with Putin in Alaska, after which the US leader claimed he had “begun the arrangements” for such a meeting, which might later expand into a three-way summit. Speaking on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in China on Monday, Ushakov confirmed that Putin and Trump had discussed raising the level of the negotiating team for direct talks between Moscow and Kiev, but stressed that no decision has been finalized. “What the press reports is not what we agreed on. They often talk about a trilateral meeting, about a meeting between Putin and Zelensky, but there was no agreement on this between Putin and Trump,” Ushakov said. He added that while the US delegation promised specific proposals on such meetings after Alaska, none have yet been made. The issue, he noted, remains under discussion. According to Ushakov, the Ukraine conflict was a key topic in Putin’s talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the SCO summit on Monday. He did not disclose details of those conversations. Speaking earlier in the day, Putin said Moscow values the efforts of its strategic partners to end the hostilities, and promised to brief colleagues on his conversations with Trump during bilateral talks. The Russian leader stressed that any potential Ukraine peace deal would only hold if “the root causes of the crisis… [are] eliminated.” He reiterated that one of the main causes of the conflict was the West’s “attempts to drag Ukraine into NATO, which represent a direct threat to Russia’s security.” View the full article

When most people hear the words sacred sexuality, they picture better orgasms, exotic positions, or maybe a workshop where everyone is sitting on floor cushions trying not to look awkward. Some think of the Kama Sutra, as if sacred sexuality could be boiled down to a catalog of acrobatics and advanced flexibility. I used to think the same—that it was about technique, about “spicing things up,” about finding some mystical upgrade to the bedroom. But sacred sexuality isn’t about sex at all. It’s about presence. It’s about showing up with your whole self—your breath, your attention, your messy humanness—and daring to be fully alive in a moment without performing or chasing an outcome. Sacred sexuality isn’t about what happens between bodies. It’s about how we inhabit our own body, our own breath, and our own truth. The Culture of Performance Our culture has turned sex into performance. It’s treated like a competition, complete with scorecards: attraction, technique, stamina, the grand finale. Intimacy becomes about “how well we did” instead of how deeply we connected. Sacred sexuality laughs at that. It doesn’t care about medals or rankings. It cares about honesty, breath, and presence. It asks: Can I be here fully? Can I touch without trying to take? Can I be touched without trying to prove anything? That’s a much scarier question than whether the candles are lit or the playlist is on point. What It Actually Is In Tantra, sexuality is seen as life force—the same energy that pulls the ocean tides and makes your heart race when someone you love brushes your hand. Sacred sexuality is about honoring that energy as divine. Sometimes it flows between two people. But sometimes it’s just you and your breath, sitting in silence, realizing that intimacy begins long before anyone else enters the room. It’s not about tricks or formulas. It’s not even about mastering every page of the Kama Sutra. It’s about dissolving the illusion that the sacred is somewhere else. Stirring soup can be sacred. A deep belly laugh can be sacred. Holding someone’s hand in silence can be sacred. Because when you strip it all down (pun intended), sacred sexuality is about reverence—for yourself, for another, for life itself. Beyond the Bedroom The secret is that sacred sexuality doesn’t stay in the bedroom. It spills into everything. It’s how you walk into a room and let your whole being arrive instead of just your body. It’s how you fold laundry with tenderness instead of resentment. It’s how a quiet meal shared with someone you love feels like prayer. Sacred sexuality is aliveness. It’s the soul actually inhabiting the skin. And once you taste that, you realize intimacy has very little to do with what happens under the sheets—and everything to do with how awake you are to life. Why This Matters We live in a culture obsessed with outcomes: how many likes, how much money, how many years together, how much pleasure. Sacred sexuality is the antidote. It says: Stop measuring. Start being. Because the paradox is this: the less you chase “better sex,” the more intimacy unfolds. The less you try to control, the more connection shows up. And that’s not just good for relationships. It’s good for life. The Takeaway Sacred sexuality isn’t about sex—it’s about love, freedom, and presence. It’s about honoring the energy that moves through us as divine, instead of reducing it to performance or achievement. It’s about remembering that intimacy is less about fireworks and more about the warmth of the flame. And here’s the kicker: sacred sexuality doesn’t guarantee forever any more than conscious relationships do. But it does guarantee honesty. It guarantees aliveness. It guarantees that, for however long it lasts, you are really there. Because sacred sexuality is less about what happens between bodies, and more about what happens when two souls dare to be fully present. iStock image The post Sacred Sexuality Isn’t About Sex appeared first on The Good Men Project. View the full article

Viktor Yanukovich said he wanted Ukraine to join the EU, but knew that membership in the military bloc would be “a disaster” Former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich has said he had always been a staunch opponent of Ukraine joining NATO, warning that such a move would have sparked a civil war. Yanukovich served as president from 2010 to 2014, when he was ousted in the Western-backed Maidan coup and forced to flee the country, seeking refuge in Russia. Shortly afterward, the Ukrainian parliament formally stripped him of his presidential title. The protests began after Yanukovich decided to suspend preparations for Ukraine’s signing of an association agreement with the EU, explaining that the deal would have imposed harsh economic conditions and included terms he deemed unacceptable. Speaking to journalists on Monday, Yanukovich said he had always worked toward EU accession, which he described as a strategic goal of his presidency. “Indeed, I purposefully worked to bring Ukraine closer to the European Union and ultimately set the goal of Ukraine’s accession,” he said. However, in his words, Kiev’s Western European partners behaved condescendingly during the talks. “They showed no understanding of the complexity of Ukraine’s economic situation. Frankly, they displayed arrogance,” he added. Yanukovich stressed that while he had been firmly committed to pursuing Ukraine’s EU integration, he had always rejected NATO membership. He said he had “clearly and distinctly understood that this is a disaster for Ukraine” and a “road to nowhere.” “It is a direct path to civil war,” he emphasized. After Yanukovich’s ouster, which Moscow condemned as illegal, the new authorities in Kiev began openly working toward NATO membership, an ambition that was encouraged by the US. Russia has said these moves were among the root causes of the current conflict and has demanded that Ukraine remain neutral and refrain from joining military blocs as a part of any peace settlement. View the full article

By Josh Hasting While countertops often serve as convenient storage areas for frequently used items, overcrowding them with unnecessary or unsuitable objects can lead to clutter, hygiene issues, and potential hazards or financial waste. By identifying items that are better stored elsewhere, such as perishable foods, cleaning supplies, and small appliances with limited use, individuals can declutter their countertops, create a more functional and aesthetically pleasing kitchen environment, and save money. 1. Fruits Exposed to Ethylene Gas Certain fruits, like bananas and apples, release ethylene gas that can speed up the ripening of other produce. Store these in a bowl on the counter, but keep them away from veggies and fruits that are ethylene-sensitive, like avocados and berries. 2. Sponges and Cleaning Cloths Kitchens are full of moisture, making sponges and cloths prime targets for bacterial growth. Don’t let them become a hidden health hazard! Microwave damp sponges for 30 seconds to kill bacteria, or air dry them completely before storing them. Consider replacing them regularly. 3. Coffee Grounds Although they could be useful for a fast pick-me-up, coffee grounds also draw unwelcome pests like gnats. Store them in an airtight container in the pantry or freezer to maintain freshness and keep creepy crawlies at bay. If you’ve enjoyed reading our content and are passionate about learning wealth, managing your finances, and achieving financial freedom, we’d love for you to join our community! Click here to follow Invested Wallet for more. 4. Cookbooks We love a good cookbook, but countertops are a messy business. Flour spills, splatters of sauce – your favorite recipes can quickly become a greasy mess. Invest in a cookbook holder or store them on a nearby shelf. 5. Rarely Used Appliances Consider the popcorn machine you use a couple of times a year. These bulky appliances are space hogs. Store them away in cabinets or on a pantry shelf. They’ll be there when you need them, but not cramping your counter style. 6. Olive Oil Heat and light are enemies of olive oil. Exposure can break down the oil, making it lose its flavor and health benefits. Find a cool, dark cabinet for your bottle of liquid gold. 7. Pet Food and Bowls Fluffy’s kibble might seem convenient on the counter, but it can attract unwanted pests like ants and flies. Store pet food in sealed containers in a cool, dry place. And wash their bowls regularly, not right next to where you prepare your meals. 8. Electronics Kitchens are wet and prone to spillage, so keep phones, tablets, and even that sleek new smart speaker out of there. One accidental splash can mean an expensive tech funeral. Keep your electronics in a safe, dry zone. 9. Serveware Cake stands and platters are infrequently used objects that occupy valuable space. Find a cabinet or designated shelf for them. Beautiful serving pieces deserve a special place, not collecting dust on the counter. 10. Wine Bottles Sure, they look fancy, but constant temperature fluctuations and light exposure aren’t ideal for wine. Store bottles in a cool, dark place like a wine rack or cellar. Your vino will thank you for it. 11. Dirty Dishes Let’s be honest, we’ve all left a plate or two for “later.” But dirty dishes are a breeding ground for bacteria and fruit flies. Clear them promptly after meals, or rinse and load them in the dishwasher to keep your counter sparkling. 12. Vitamins and Medications Heat, light, and moisture can degrade the effectiveness of medications and vitamins. Store them in a cool, dry place like a cabinet or drawer, not on the counter where the stove and dishwasher reside. 13. Houseplants While greenery brightens a space, houseplants can harbor tiny critters or become a breeding ground for mold if not properly cared for. Admire them from afar on a windowsill or plant stand, but keep them away from your food prep zone. 14. Non-Refrigerated Vegetables Vegetables like potatoes, onions, and garlic are best stored in a cool, dark place rather than on the countertop. This prevents them from sprouting and keeps your counter clear for other uses. 15. Flammable Items Matches, lighters, and other flammable items should be kept away from the kitchen counter to avoid accidental fires. Store them in a safe place, far from heat sources like the stove or oven. Follow Invested Wallet For More If you’ve enjoyed reading our content and are passionate about learning wealth, managing your finances, and achieving financial freedom, we’d love for you to join our community! Click here to follow Invested Wallet for more. — Previously Published on The Invested Wallet. — Subscribe to The Good Men Project Newsletter Email Address * Subscribe If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today. All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS. Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here. — Photo credit: iStock.com The post 15 Costly Mistakes Sitting on Your Kitchen Counter appeared first on The Good Men Project. View the full article

When one thinks of bears they often think of the fuzzy cubs with the bright curious eyes and funny antics of tree climbing. As sweet as bears look they can be a force of nature, which is how Mother Earth designed it. How Americans came to fall in love with bears is an often misquoted story. In 1902 big game hunter former President Teddy Roosevelt was on a bear hunt with other hunters. They tied a bear to a tree and encouraged Roosevelt to shoot the tied up bear. Roosevelt refused saying that it was unsportsmanlike. News spread quickly shocking many but also planting the seed that shooting tied up animals was an unethical and cruel thing to do. A cartoon soon appeared of the incident followed by a stuffed animal called ‘teddy’s bear’ a.k.a. the teddy bear. That is how most Americans came to learn about bears since few had ever seen one. The cartoon that started a new way of thinking about bears and hunting Black Bears in Florida Unlike the Grizzly or Polar Bears the Black Bear is mostly an herbivore, though classified as omnivores they eat both plants and animals. They sustain themselves more on berries, grasses, nuts, and succulent plants which makes up nearly 80% of their diet. The remainder of their diet comes from insects, larvae, fish, honey, and occasionally carrion. Bears in Florida don’t have as thick a fur or as much fat as bears further north due to the year round heat. Black bears reproduce slowly and are susceptible to overkill, especially during unregulated hunts. A female reaches breeding age at 4 years and gives birth every 2-3 years depending on available food and habitat which can be depleted by droughts and wildfires along with development. We have all of those in Florida. Her cubs stay with her past the first year. A hunt would surely kill a nursing mom ultimately leaving her cubs orphaned and starving to death. Trophy hunters target breeding adults that disrupt the animals’ social structure and further slow reproduction. This biology negates the myth and lie of overpopulation. In 2015 it was estimated their population was about 4000 but exact numbers are impossible to get. After working on 3 state permits for FWC for 11 years I personally know how they inflate the numbers and exaggerate to fit their pre planned agenda. So where is the proof of 4000 bears? There is none. Population studies won’t even be completed until 2029. Hunting has never proven to resolve human/bear conflict most of which is caused by humans, sorry but it’s true. Humans that live in bear country often leave their trash out and not ‘bear proof’ and let their pets out unsupervised. I see stories like this all the time. It’s not bears, or any animal, that needs managing but people’s behavior. Education goes a long way and there’s been proof of that. Contrary to media stories designed to get attention and more readers bear attacks are rare. Black bears as they should be – wild and free The 2015 bear massacre In 2014 the Florida Fish Wildlife Commission (FWC) held hearings around the state, which I attended and spoke at, to gauge public opinion on a proposal to hunt bears. Only 1 commissioner opposed the hunt, he no longer sits on the commission, and the hunt went through. What was planned to be a 7 day event ended after 2 days because more bears were killed than planned. In the panhandle 3 times the number of bears allowed were killed. Over 3000 people had hunting permits to kill 300 bears. You do the math. Dead cubs, yearlings and nursing mothers were killed and photographed at checkpoints. Public disgust spread quickly as Florida’s shame was put on display on the international stage Click here to read about the 2015 disaster https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2015/10/26/florida-bear-hunt-ends-after-2-day-season/74612298/ The FWC Commissioners in charge Back in December 2024 the commission said no action was needed regarding the bear population. That all changed the following month when Commissioner Gary Lester asked, or was it demanded, the bear management division come up with a proposal for a bear hunt. Lester just happens to be vice president of the massive The Villages in central Florida a.k.a. bear country. He has a proposal to expand into Leesburg , no coincidence bears also live there. I suspect killing the bears to clear a path for his housing project is his agenda and why he cast his vote last May for yes on the hunt. Commissioner Rodney Barreto is a former Miami City cop during the 1980s, the heyday of the drug cartels, dirty deals and violence. Corruption seemed to be everywhere. In 2021 Barreto got into hot water when he tried to get several acres of submerged land he bought four years earlier, filled and dredged in the Lake Worth Lagoon. He tried to do this without state or FWC approval for the condos he planned. The media which still exposed corruption back then reported on it and the deal was squashed, though I suspect it will reappear again. It’s no wonder he votes for bear hunts in his mind land is only valuable if his buildings sit on them. He was quoted on video saying he’s a business man which begs the question why are developers and hunters the only commissioners of a so called wildlife conservation agency? Or is it just a CON? As of 2024 these are the listed active companies Rodney Barreto has, could be others: Otter Creek Investments, Inc. 1990 Otter Creek Market, Inc. 1991 235 Catalonia, Inc. 1996 Barreto Holdings, LLC 2002 Barreto Management Limited Liability Company 2003 12310 LLC 2005 Blue Water Express, LLC 2006 Bg Commercial, LLC 2007 Barreto Cunningham May Dudley, doing business as Floridian Partners, formed in 2009. They provide consulting, strategic advice, and lobbying services. The Company specializes in areas such as campaigns, elections, legislative, and insurance regulatory practices, as well as telecommunications and utilities. Silver Oak Plantation Ts, LLC 2010 Plan B Marine, LLC 2015 Bnm Opa, LLC 2016 ·Government Lot 1, LLC 2016 ·Barreto Capital LLC 2017 ·Btw Investments, LLC 2019 Rodney & Sheila Barreto Family Foundation, Inc 2019 Barreto Real Estate Group, LLC 2021 (run by son Bradley) Commissioner Preston Farrior is a big game bow hunter. He has lots of photos of himself with many dead animals he proudly displays with zero compunction. Of course he wants a cruel trophy by bow hunting of bears, he obviously enjoys killing from all of his published selfies on instagram and bow hunting magazines. Pictures show his true colors. Commissioner Gary Nicklaus claimed he wasn’t behind the secret plot to develop Florida state parks with golf courses, pickleball courts and spas. But he is partner of Nicklaus, Brown & Co which designs golf course all over the world. Of course it’s hard to believe Nicklaus, a former pro golfer himself, wasn’t pushing for golf courses. His father was famous golfer Jack Nicklaus who tried the same thing in 2011 where he would design them. Coincidence? Commissioner Steve Hudson, Vice Chair and also a hunter. He’s the CEO of Hudson Capital Group which is a huge development company. Conflict of interest? Commissioner Sonya Rood is a hunter, I think her vote for hunting is self-explanatory. At the May 2025 meeting in Ocala she pretended to not know how cruel archery was, hard to imagine a hunter not knowing that arrows rarely kill immediately that seems like hunter knowledge 101 to me. If it’s not clear that developers run this fake agency go back read it again. Not one commissioner has any tangible conservation expertise and was placed by either Gov. Scott or Gov. Desantis to hold the seat for more unnecessary development. All of which the commissioners and governors benefit from in some form. How do most people feel about bears? They want them protected not slaughtered as shown in FWC’s own bear management survey and nothing has changed except the agency’s attitude toward them. True colors of FWC Most of the public is unaware of the dirty tactics and secret deals FWC engages in but word is getting out. While the majority of people DO support conservation and protecting our air, water and food they are pretty much in the dark about the agencies their tax dollars pay for. Most are easily fooled with slick public relations stunts and by controlling the media. FWC knows few will take the time to research what’s really going on. When they do they’re shocked and angry. Click here to read more about how this agency really operates. They make claims of protecting Manatees, Panthers, Sea Turtles, the water and it’s all a lie. I’ve seen it firsthand. Also included in the article is how this agency lacks all decency or ethics. They have their own non- profit called Fish & Wildlife Foundation of Florida that admitted a whopping $10,777,105 on their 2020 IRS 990 tax form. https://www.realitycheckswithstacilee.com/post/florida-agency-gets-billion-budget-a-nonprofit-but-where-does-the-money-really-go Bear Warriors United has been working for years educating people who live in bear country about ‘bear proofing’ their trash. This non lethal method does work with a proven track record. Bears don’t want you trash but when their home is depleted of food they will look elsewhere. So would you if you were starving and had kids to feed. Katrina Shadix, founder of Bear Warriors had this enlightening statement “I think it’s important that word gets out that hunters are being used as tools, literally and figuratively, to wipe bears off the landscape which makes it easier to develop. The hunters are doing this at a time when habitat for wildlife is facing the biggest habitat loss and water contamination crises in the history of the state. Bears are the sentinels of our forests as manatees are the sentinels of our waters.” She added, and I agree, how reckless the government is. “and the government is taking great plea$ure….and profit.…in killing them both.” If we fail to save them who will? Former FWC law enforcement investigator speaks out about fraud & corruption I spoke with a former FWC law enforcement officer who worked there for 14 years , for 8 of those years as an investigator, also doing undercover work and as a rescue diver. For now we’ll use ‘John Doe’ as his name. We spoke in 2024 and he had this to say “you’ll never be able to prove things because the way they hide things is very intricate and detailed and they know exactly what their doing.” When explaining how FWC would investigate poachers he said they were the bigger offender killing as many animals as needed “so let’s say we wanted to infiltrate some poachers right, so we would go out and we would kill whatever that particular species would be but not just kill, we would kill I’m talking about hundreds and hundreds of deer, fish, alligators, you name it birds, squirrels, anything it took and this is not on the clock work. You’re getting paid but it’s not documented. So what the agency would have us do is go procure product, in other words, if they wanted to get some bad guys to look awesome to the media, you know some guys that were maybe killing a few deer we would go out and meet and kill droves of deer just to sell to them or we would go out, say they’re selling fish, we would go out and catch hundreds of them with the help of the biologists and we’d net them by the hundreds, thousands some time so we were committing felonies on the clock to catch people committing misdemeanors.” Click here to listen to the above clip about poaching He confirmed what I have also witnessed and long known that government work is a free pass to not work and how they don’t give care about wildlife or the oceans or anything but money. Regarding FDEP, they are charged with protecting the environment like the forests were the bears live, are just as corrupt. FWC and FDEP work in tandem but not for the greater good as they have both been co-opted by developers and politicians like Gov. Desantis who cater to them. “ Government work is a free pass to not doing sh*t . Nobody does anything about it So FDEP was the ultimate. It was very well known in state law enforcement if you were to get a job with FDEP that is a free pass to not doing sh*t for the rest of your life.” …….they don’t care if a thousand f*cking sea turtles die (I can also attest to that) it’s all a dog and pony show for both those agencies.” Click here to listen to the above clip about the truth about government agencies The full interview runs 50 minutes but you see how FWC really operates no matter what the species no matter what the damage it’s all lies, fraud and corruption for a few making money. The proposed 2025 hunt & how it will be more cruel After reading about who makes the decision and why, this is how it differs from 2015. This year marks an even more perverse and cruel policy to hunt bears. Aside from ignoring overwhelming public outcry against the hunt FWC is planning to push it through. This demonstrates what many have long known that government on all levels operates for themselves and the privileged that ‘$upport’ them. Those that stand in the shadows with large open pocketbooks and secret bank accounts truly run the government, put people in power via a rigged election system and write the laws and policies the public falsely thinks will help them. Among the new add-ons for 2025 are: Bait traps – Remember what Roosevelt said about tied up bears? Bait traps are very much like that. Picture yourself being a little hungry, you see a snack and go for it. Suddenly you’re shot for no reason. You didn’t attack, charge or bite anyone but killed anyway just because you were there. Now you know how the bears feel. This is what girly cowards do. Hounding/dog hunting – It’s barbaric, because it is. Never mind that British upper crust use dogs to rip apart foxes in their excuse of a tradition it’s no less unseemly and cowardly for any species. Imagine a pack of dogs, probably violently abused as this method is extra violent, chasing you. Being terrified you are conscious you can’t escape as they bite and rip your flesh from you causing extreme pain. Sounds like psychopathic behavior right? This is how many deer are killed in America too. Click here to see the truth about using dogs to hunt https://www.thedogwars.com/?fbclid=IwY2xjawLX269leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFERTVqQXdxNUFlcURTRGV4AR7eyyxvmOLjoP-FFGcXHTmb9PzNgSZmjGDlqWWQc9jmODUMWkIOjcllAKAQvQ_aem_PpoaO2MIBwzUUfG4HwwH5A NO check stations – Because when you do something so insidious you know deep down is a sick crime against nature you don’t want witnesses taking pictures. Why else would they ban the public? In 2015 photos of slaughtered cubs, yearlings and nursing mothers made the global internet trek around the world so FWC won’t have any of that this time. This is really just a plan to wipeout bears altogether. Archery – This may sound like a fun sport but death by arrow is slow and painful and not one any human would want for themselves. Using this method is for those that like to inflict pain. Beware of fake conservation or environmental groups who support hunting and spoke in favor of another bear hunt. “Bear is a game species. It’s time for us to have some level of bear hunt,” said Travis Thompson, executive director at the All Florida conservation organization as reported by the Associate Press May 21. 2025. How you can help Stop the Hunt Email the commissioners and ask them to vote NO in August on the 2025 bear hunt and ask how they don’t have a conflict of interest when their resume says otherwise Rodney.Barreto@MyFWC.com Steven.Hudson@MyFWC.com Preston.Farrior@MyFWC.com Sonya.Rood@MyFWC.com Albert.Maury@MyFWC.com Gary.Nicklaus@MyFWC.com Gary.Lester@MyFWC.com Morgan.Richardson@myfwc.com – Director, Hunting & Game Management Division Call and Email Governor DeSantis Tell him you oppose the hunt and support protecting black bears. Phone Number: (850) 717-9337GovernorRon.Desantis@eog.myflorida.com Email the FWC Subject: I Oppose the Florida Black Bear Hunt to: BearComments@MyFWC.com You can simply write: “I oppose the Florida black bear hunt.” Click to sign & share https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-florida-black-bear-trophy-hunt?fbclid=IwY2xjawLXyjpleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETE5dHFPam04dW9XeEYyTTEwAR46XfKbd5moTDkCj1Q4tzXyac6BD7nVpz0pnEczJ9ELT5xpHTHMEjpNK0b-Ew_aem_imfbCWGu4AKfaJDDmPphMg **Attend the vote – Dates: August 13th – 14th, 2025 Time: 8:30 AM – 5:00 PM (Arrive at 7:30 am to register to speak). Location: Florida Highway Patrol Training Academy 75 College Ave., Havana, Florida 32333 Support groups working to save the bears https://www.beardefenders.org/florida https://bearwarriorsunited.com/stop-the-bear-hunt/ Call for a change of who sits on the FWC Commission, only true conservationists should ever be allowed to work for FWC or FDEP otherwise it’s just fraud. This is true in all 50 states. — This post was previously published on Reality Check with Staci Lee and is republished on Medium. *** You may also like these posts on The Good Men Project: White Fragility: Talking to White People About Racism Escape the “Act Like a Man” Box The Lack of Gentle Platonic Touch in Men’s Lives is a Killer What We Talk About When We Talk About Men Join The Good Men Project as a Premium Member today. All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS. A $50 annual membership gives you an all access pass. You can be a part of every call, group, class and community. A $25 annual membership gives you access to one class, one Social Interest group and our online communities. A $12 annual membership gives you access to our Friday calls with the publisher, our online community. Register New Account Log in if you wish to renew an existing subscription. Username Email First Name Last Name Password Password Again Choose your subscription level Dating Masterclass - $999.00 - unlimited Dating Masterclass: How to Date and Create Satisfying and Lasting Love and Sexi in this Crazy, Modern World 5 Ways to Build Confidence - $99.00 - unlimited 5 Ways to Build Confidence and Make Meeting and Dating Women Less Nerve-Wracking Monthly Platinum - free - unlimited Monthly - $6.99 - 1 Month Yearly - $50.00 - 1 Year Sponsored Columnist Annual - $1,250.00 - 1 Year Sponsored Columnist Monthly - $150.00 - 1 Month Annual Platinum - $50.00 - 1 Year Annual Gold - $25.00 - 1 Year Monthly Gold - $20.00 - 1 Month Annual Bronze - $12.00 - 1 Year Credit / Debit Card PayPal Choose Your Payment Method Auto Renew By completing this registration form, you are also agreeing to our Terms of Service which can be found here. Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here. — Photo credit: iStock The post Florida Set for 2025 Bear Hunt (Massacre) Despite Public Outcry appeared first on The Good Men Project. View the full article

Check this out: Library Extension shows you what’s at over 5,000 libraries while you browse the web. You can borrow books, music or audiobooks without spending a dime. Best part? You don’t need to sign up. Get it on Chrome, Firefox and Edge. The post Check this out appeared first on Komando.com. View the full article

Lithuania has already received funds for monitoring of its border with Russia’s Kaliningrad Region, the Commission president has said The EU intends to intensify its monitoring of trains traveling between mainland Russia and its Kaliningrad exclave through Lithuania, European Commission (EC) President Ursula von der Leyen has said. At a joint press conference with Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda on Monday, von der Leyen called Lithuania a “frontline state” facing “Russia in Kaliningrad” and accused Moscow of applying “geopolitical and economic pressure” on its neighbor. Lithuania shares a border with Belarus, Russia’s key ally, in the East, and with Russia’s Kaliningrad exclave in the West. ”Lithuania has a €357 million EU program that is dedicated for border management and visa policy,” von der Leyen announced, adding that “we have on a regular basis added money to it.” The bloc’s financial resources have, among other areas, been directed toward “surveillance capacities [for] tracking the trains… [traveling] between mainland Russia and Kaliningrad” as well as the “purchase of a helicopter.” Brussels has “proposed to triple investment in migration and border management” in the next long-term EU budget and increase military spending fivefold, she noted. In July, the EC unveiled a long-term €2 trillion ($2.33 trillion) draft budget for 2028-34, with a massive increase in military-related spending. Bloc member states have agreed on allocating €800 billion ($937 billion) until 2030 as part of the EU’s Security Action for Europe (SAFE) initiative. Rail traffic from Kaliningrad to the rest of Russia must pass through Lithuania. Soon after the outbreak of the Ukraine conflict in 2022, Vilnius announced that it would block the transit of goods that fall under EU sanctions on its territory. Moscow accused Lithuania of mounting a blockade of Kaliningrad region. The situation was partially resolved, after the rail connection was reopened. Moscow has dismissed Western claims that it harbors aggressive plans toward EU countries as “nonsense,” and accused officials in Brussels of fearmongering to justify inflated military budgets. View the full article

Leading international experts, including from the UN and India, will meet in Vladivostok to discuss fragmentation and new global trade rules Leading international experts are set to descend on Russia’s Pacific city of Vladivostok to debate how to overcome fragmentation and shape a new framework for global trade. The Pacific port will this week host ‘The Future of the World. A New Platform for Global Growth,’ on September 5. The Open Dialogue platform was launched on the instruction of President Vladimir Putin, with its inaugural forum held in Moscow in April, bringing together more than 100 delegates from 48 countries. Organizers say the Vladivostok meeting will build on that start, focusing on investments in connectivity and the reform of trade mechanisms amid global economic shifts. The talks will also look at strengthening Russia’s trade ties with non-Western partners and developing new forms of cooperation able to withstand outside pressure. Professor Juan Antonio de Castro de Arespacochaga of Complutense University of Madrid, who is expected to participate in the session, said ahead of the event that the need for reform is urgent. “Global trade is becoming fragmented, fast, and technology-driven. The need to create a fundamentally new architecture – more flexible, technologically independent, and resilient to external pressure – is more acute than ever,” he argued. Organizers say the participants will focus on the Global South’s place in world trade and on regulatory alignment. Rupa Chanda, Director of the Trade, Investment and Innovation Division at the UN’s Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, will travel from India to present a report on overcoming global fragmentation. “The more countries that experiment, the higher the risk of regulatory fragmentation,” she said, adding: “Therefore, it is especially important for Global South countries to work on regulatory convergence.” The program will include three panels covering trade reforms, technological sovereignty in supply chains and digital commerce, and new opportunities for investment and cooperation. View the full article

With special guest Kristen Pressner You may know Kristen Pressner from her provocative TEDx talk “Are you biased? I am.” along with her ‘Flip it to test’ framework to check unconscious bias. Kristen joins us to highlight another sensitive subject, why is it that so many people ‘can’t get it together’? Kristen is a trailblazing people leader who believes in the potential in each of us. As Global Head of People & Culture for a prominent multinational company, her passion for equity and inclusion makes her a sought-after voice and she is often featured on international ‘Top HR Influencer’ lists. Julie Kratz and Kristen Pressner discuss: How to unlock the full potential of people to be their best, her family’s diagnosis with ADHD and how it shaped her thinking as a leader, and her journey to unlock the mystery of ADHD, neurodivergent brains and the potential consequences (including mental health).  Unlocking ADHD as a Superpower This episode features Kristen Pressner, Global Head of People and Culture for a prominent multinational corporation, and a trailblazing leader in equity and inclusion. Pressner shares the deeply personal backstory behind her new TEDx talk, “What if our understanding of neurodiversity is all wrong?” After realizing that her traditional HR and leadership strategies weren’t working with her own four children, she discovered that her entire family, except for herself, was neurodivergent. This eye-opening experience led her to question conventional understandings of neurodiversity and advocate for a more “brain-friendly” approach in all aspects of life, including the workplace. Pressner highlights a common unconscious bias: the belief that everyone is primarily motivated by importance. Through her family’s experience, she realized that many neurodivergent individuals are instead motivated by interest, which is highly individual and fluid. She argues that the modern world, shaped by industrial revolutions, has created systems (like regimented schooling and production-focused workplaces) that are not built for neurodivergent strengths, often leading to misdiagnoses of character flaws like laziness or lack of passion. Pressner advocates for shifting systemic approaches to be more accommodating, not just for neurodivergent individuals, but for everyone. She introduces the concept of being a “brain friend”—someone who is curious, non-judgmental, and willing to take small, individualized actions to optimize how others work and thrive. She emphasizes that neurodivergence often comes with “superpowers” like unique thinking, intense creativity, and resilience, which are valuable assets in any organization. Key Takeaways: Neurodiversity is Misunderstood: Neurodivergence often doesn’t look like what many people assume it does, and there’s a widespread misunderstanding of its manifestations. Motivation by Interest vs. Importance: While many assume importance is the primary motivator, neurodivergent individuals are often more driven by personal interest, challenging conventional approaches to engagement. Systemic Misfit, Not Character Flaw: The “failure to launch” or “can’t get it together” often attributed to neurodivergent individuals stems from systems (like schools and workplaces) not being built for their strengths, rather than a character flaw. Be a “Brain Friend”: To be an ally, adopt a “brain-friendly” approach: be curious, non-judgemental, and willing to make small, individualized accommodations to bring out the best in others. Neurodivergent Superpowers: Neurodivergence brings significant upsides, including unique thinking, hidden connections, flexibility, resilience, and intense imagination and creativity, which are highly valuable in the workplace. Accommodations Benefit All: Tweaks to systems to accommodate neurodivergent individuals, such as flexible work hours or quiet spaces, often benefit neurotypical people as well. Actionable Allyship Takeaway: When someone seems to be struggling to “get it together” in baffling ways, approach the situation with curiosity and non-judgment instead of assuming character flaws. Ask questions about how they are best optimized, recognizing that their brain may simply be wired differently, and be willing to make small, individualized interventions to bring out their best, which can lead to significant positive outcomes for everyone. Follow Kristen’s work at https://kristenpressner.com/ and find Julie at https://www.nextpivotpoint.com/ Full Episode Transcript Available Here — This post was previously published on Next Pivot Point. *** You may also like these posts on The Good Men Project: Escape the Act Like a Man Box What We Talk About When We Talk About Men Why I Don’t Want to Talk About Race The First Myth of the Patriarchy: The Acorn on the Pillow Subscribe to The Good Men Project Newsletter Email Address * Subscribe If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today. All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS. Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here. Photo credit: iStock The post Unlocking the Superpower of ADHD With Kristen Pressner appeared first on The Good Men Project. View the full article

Xi, Putin and Modi have lead calls in Tianjin for a UN-centered multipolar system, as Eurasian blocs tighten and the EU is sidelined The latest gathering of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in Tianjin looks at first like another summit – handshakes, family portraits, scripted statements. But the meeting on August 31–September 1 is more than diplomatic theater: it is another marker of the end of the unipolar era dominated by the United States, and the rise of a multipolar system centered on Asia, Eurasia, and the Global South. At the table were Chinese President Xi Jinping, his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi – together representing more than a third of humanity and 3 of largest countries on Earth. Xi unveiled a broad Global Governance Initiative, including a proposed SCO development bank, cooperation on artificial intelligence, and financial support for developing nations. Putin described the SCO as “a vehicle for genuine multilateralism” and called for a Eurasian security model beyond Western control. Modi’s presence – his first visit to China in years – and the powerful optics around his meeting with Putin, signaled that India is willing to be seen as part of this emerging order. What just happened (and why it’s bigger than a photo-op) The pitch: Xi is promoting an order that “democratizes” global governance and reduces dependence on US-centric finance (think: less dollar gravity, more regional institutions). Putin called the SCO a vehicle for “genuine multilateralism” and Eurasian security. By calling China a partner rather than a rival, Modi signaled New Delhi won’t be locked into Washington’s anti-China agenda. The audience: More than 20 non-Western leaders were in the room, with United Nations (UN) Secretary-General António Guterres endorsing the event organisation – not a club meeting in the shadows, but a UN-centered frame at a China-led forum. Translation: “We want the UN Charter back – not someone else’s in-house rules” Beijing’s line is blunt: reject Cold War blocs and restore the UN system as the only universal legal baseline. That’s a direct rebuke to the post-1991 “rules-based international order”, drafted in Washington or Brussels and enforced selectively. Examples are not hard to find. The 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia went ahead without a UN mandate, justified under the “responsibility to protect.” The 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq was launched despite the absence of Security Council approval – a war later admitted even by Western officials to have been based on false premises. In 2011, a UN resolution authorizing a no-fly zone over Libya was used by NATO to pursue outright regime change, leaving behind a failed state and opening a corridor of misery into the heart of Western Europe. For China, Russia and many Global South states, these episodes proved that the “rules-based order” was never about universal law but about Western discretion. The insistence in Tianjin that the UN Charter be restored as the only legitimate framework is meant to flip the script: to argue that the SCO, BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and new members Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates, plus Indonesia), and their partners are defending the actual rules of international law, while the West substitutes ad hoc coalitions and shifting standards for its own convenience. Both Xi and Putin drove the point home, but in different registers. Xi’s line: He denounced “hegemonism and bullying behavior” and called for a “democratization of global governance,” stressing that the SCO should serve as a model of true multilateralism anchored in the UN and the World Trade Organization (WTO), not in ad hoc “rules” devised by a few Western capitals. Putin’s line: He went further, charging that the United States and its allies were directly responsible for the conflict escalation in Ukraine, and arguing that the SCO offers a framework for a genuine Eurasian security order – one not dictated by NATO or Western-imposed standards. The architecture replacing unipolarity (it’s already here) Security spine: The Shanghai Cooperation Organization brings together Russia, China, India and Central Asian states to coordinate security, counterterrorism and intelligence – the hard-power framework that makes the rest possible. Economic boardrooms: BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) expanded in 2024 to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates, followed by Indonesia in 2025. With its New Development Bank and a drive for trade in national currencies, it now acts as a counterweight to the Group of Seven (G7). Regional weight: The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) – a ten-member bloc shaping Asian trade and standards – increasingly aligns with SCO and BRICS projects. Energy leverage: The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), six Arab monarchies, coordinate policy through the wider Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries Plus (OPEC+), giving them control over key oil flows. Taken together, these bodies already function as a parallel governance system that doesn’t need Western sponsorship or veto power. EU’s irrelevance The European Union (EU) is absent from Tianjin – and that absence speaks volumes. Once promoted as the second global pole, Europe is now tied to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) for defense, dependent on outside energy, and fractured internally. Even its flagship Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) has soured relations with India and other Global South economies. In Tianjin, Europe was not a participant in decisions – only a spectator. After the talks, the tanks The SCO summit precedes China’s Victory Day military parade in Beijing on September 3, commemorating 80 years since Japan’s surrender in World War II. Xi, Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, with whom Moscow has a bilateral security pact, will stand together as Beijing showcases intercontinental missiles, long-range strike systems and drone formations. The spectacle will likely demonstrate that multipolarity is not just a form of diplomatic language, but that it backed by the hard power on display. Why Tianjin matters beyond Tianjin A rival rule-set with institutions: From a Shanghai Cooperation Organization bank to BRICS financing and potential ASEAN–GCC coordination, there is now a procedural path to act without Western oversight. UN-first framing: By anchoring legitimacy in the UN Charter, the bloc positions Western “rules-based” frameworks as partisan. India’s calculus: Modi’s public handshakes with Xi and Putin have normalized a Eurasian triangle that Washington and Brussels cannot easily fracture. Europe’s shrinking veto: EU regulations such as the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism no longer set the agenda in Eurasia, where energy, trade and security are coordinated elsewhere. The bottom line The Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit in Tianjin was less about formal speeches than about symbolism. It signalled that the unipolar world has ended. From development banks to energy corridors to parades of missiles, a new multipolar order is taking shape – and it no longer asks for Western permission. View the full article

🌕 Sign me up, Scotty: You could help track Artemis II, the first crewed moon mission in 50 years. The 10-day flight (set for April 2026) will loop astronauts around the moon. If you’ve got the gear to spot Orion, NASA wants your help. Basically, if you’re into backyard stargazing and unpaid work, this is right up your alley. The post Sign me up, Scotty appeared first on Komando.com. View the full article

Russia earlier said the West is using propaganda on gender relations to undermine its statehood Traditional values are being sidelined internationally and must be brought back to the center of the global agenda, Russian President Vladimir Putin has told leaders at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in Tianjin. Speaking at the expanded session of the gathering on Monday, the Russian leader stressed that the SCO’s strength lies in its traditional “respect for historical events, cultural values, and civilizational diversity.” He added that these principles form the basis for cooperation in science and education, healthcare, and sports. Putin noted that in the cultural sphere, Moscow is organizing the Intervision song contest, to be held in Moscow on September 20. Portrayed as an alternative to Eurovision, from which Russia has been excluded due to tensions with the EU over the Ukraine conflict, Intervision is expected to feature performers from Latin America, Africa, and Asia. ”This large-scale project is aimed at promoting universal values… Traditional values are already fading into the background... It is time to bring them back to the international agenda,” he said. Putin also invited delegations to attend the St. Petersburg International United Cultures Forum next week, and the Russia – Country of Sports forum in Samara in November. Russia has made the promotion of traditional values a core domestic policy as it seeks to improve birth rates, encourage families, and protect the population from harmful content. In 2024, the parliament banned “child-free propaganda” and has for years been fighting LGBTQ propaganda. Russia has said, however, that it has never banned non-traditional relationships, arguing that the West uses the narrative regarding non-traditional relations to undermine its national identity and statehood. View the full article

The former acting mayor of Brussels’ Molenbeek district insists her remarks were only directed at xenophobic people A Belgian official has told critics of her Muslim headscarf to “get out” of the country, according a video circulating online. Saliha Raiss, a city council member for the social-democratic Vooruit party, made the controversial remarks during a municipal council session in Brussels’ Molenbeek district last Wednesday. “If people wearing headscarves bother you so much, if you don’t want to see us anymore, move... Go somewhere else, get out!” Raiss is heard saying in the clip. The footage, posted on X by Georges-Louis Bouchez, leader of the Reformist Movement (MR), quickly went viral and made headlines. In the post, Bouchez accused Raiss of racism and “imposing a new cultural norm” by attacking those who oppose religious symbols in the administration. Elon Musk reposted the clip with the caption: “Belgians must leave Belgium!? This is insane.” Post 🇫🇷& 🇺🇸 🇫🇷🚨📣 Quand L’Extrémisme Parle À Visage Découvert‼️@elonmusk réagit à ce post ⬇️ « Saliha Raiss, une femme politique de Molenbeek, veut une Europe sans Européens : “Quiconque n’accepte pas les femmes voilées, quiconque n’accepte pas l’islam en Belgique, peut… https://t.co/tKxESmVJwp pic.twitter.com/DgtJfJ7yzX — Sylvia Miami (@sylviamiami1776) September 1, 2025 Belgian media came to Raiss’ defense, claiming the words had been taken out of context. RTL Info reported the remarks came during a debate over a Facebook post on the MP party page criticizing the leaders of Molenbeek. The post drew anti-Muslim comments aimed at Raiss, then acting mayor. In the full video, she condemned MR for not deleting the post, calling them “deplorable and disgusting” and accusing the party of “condoning racism.” Belgians must leave Belgium!? This is insane. https://t.co/5UUPWY1NDv — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 31, 2025 Commenting on the incident on Monday, Raiss stood by her words and insisted they were not aimed at Belgians in general, only at those making racist comments. “I don’t regret it at all. My comments were taken out of context … I was targeting racist and xenophobic people. In no way did I make remarks against all the citizens of our beautiful town and country,” she told RTL. Vooruit party leader Conner Rousseau defended Raiss, saying she spoke in frustration as she often has to deal with racist remarks due to being Muslim, and noting that “what’s being made of that statement now by the MR and the far-right Musk is simply fake and false.” Raiss said she is considering filing a slander complaint against Bouchez, accusing him of spreading “lies” with a “doctored” video. View the full article

Enough. Enough already! The ‘anti-woke’ fervor and hysteria in the U.S. has gotten way, way out of hand. It’s spreading like a deadly mutant fungus and taking over our nation, closely paralleling the grim sci-fi hellscape of “The Last of Us.” I, for one, have had enough. I’ve seen and heard enough hateful ‘anti-woke’ nonsense to last several lifetimes. At this point, my astonishment at the intensity of ‘anti-woke’ hysteria has faded, but now I’m left with a simple question: What the heck is so wrong and bad about being ‘woke’? The crazed excesses of the ‘anti-woke’ mob Answering my question requires some crucial clarification(s). After all, what do we even mean when we use the term ‘woke’? By now, it’s crystal clear that MAGA, Trump, and the GOP use the term only in a derogatory and mean-spirited way. And the way they use it is intentionally inflammatory and divisive. Sadly, conservatives latched onto a few excesses among progressives — such as an overemphasis on ‘correct pronouns’ or support for all illegal immigrants. Then, they totally overreacted… and threw the baby out with the bathwater. They chose to mock and disparage all ‘wokeness’ — social awareness — to the point that the essence of ‘wokeness’ has been turned upside-down and twisted beyond all recognition. The far right has successfully turned ‘wokeness’ into a ridiculous and dangerous caricature — and line of attack. Now, even the Kennedy Center honors are too ‘woke’! The Smithsonian Museums are all too ‘woke’ (that is, historically accurate). Laws that protect minorities and their voting rights are now too ‘woke.’ Anything resembling ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ is way too ‘woke’! And defending women’s right to choose and their families’ right to family planning is now… horribly ‘woke.’ All social conscience must be ruthlessly suppressed Oh, I forgot: even the name ‘Kennedy Center’ was deemed ‘unacceptably woke,’ since it honors a liberal Democrat, JFK. Plus, our resident woke-hater-in-chief, DJT, lusted for the prestige associated with the Kennedy Center — and decided to take it over. He fired the board, made himself the head honcho, and plans to rename it — possibly as the Melania Trump Center. Or maybe the Donald J. Trump Center. Shudder. It gets worse. Even the society-wide effort to finally rid ourselves of statues and military bases honoring Confederate ‘heroes’ (traitors) has come under intense fire. In Texas, Fort Hood was renamed Fort Cavazos to honor a brilliant Hispanic general — and that led to a huge backlash since it was doubly ‘woke.’ That is, the Army got rid of the Confederate name and replaced it with a (horrors!) Hispanic name. That was totally intolerable to the GOP — so they refused to honor Cavazos and pressured the Army to reverse course. Acting together, they brazenly stripped away his name, and the base then reverted to the original name ‘Fort Hood.’ Like I said: the ‘anti-woke’ hysteria in the U.S. has gotten way, way out of hand. The right’s sneak attack on ‘equality and justice for all’ Here’s another crucial question: what, exactly, is the right so upset about? Why are they so opposed to any form of ‘wokeness’? I hate to say it, but it’s evident that the far right and almost the entire GOP are strongly opposed to racial fairness, increasing equity, and inclusivity. They are firmly in the racist, White supremacist camp, but don’t want to come right out and praise and promote racism. No, they can’t appear to be heavily racist… but still want and ‘need’ to push a racist, White-centered agenda. So — what to do? My take on the (hateful) right-wing thought process looks something like this: “Hey, here’s a perfect solution… a fabulous scapegoat, really. Let’s go after ‘wokeness,’ attack it mercilessly, exaggerate it, and turn it into a caricature. Let’s cynically use ‘wokeness’ as a battering ram against minorities, liberals, progressives, and left-leaning women. Yes, indeed, it’s a wonderful ‘twofer’: we get to attack and take down the ‘libs’ and greedy minorities and also slyly support more racism, oppression, and inter-racial conflict! Yeah, baby!” It’s been a golden opportunity for the right and the GOP — one they’ve embraced and pursued with gusto. The true, original meaning of ‘woke’ OK. Ugh. After that foray into depraved rightwing BS, let’s look at the real meaning of ‘woke.’ Of course, being ‘woke’ implies being awake and aware — and this was its original (still applicable) meaning. It originated as an expression in the Black community that emphasized awareness of deep cultural imbalances and ongoing racist practices. It sought to raise awareness about structural racism and Blacks’ (and later, Hispanics’) struggle for racial parity and economic equity. In other words, being ‘woke’ meant being aware of real, active societal trends and forces that oppress or persecute non-Whites. It was simply a natural, intelligent social response to overt or subtle oppression. Then, over time, many ideas subsumed under the banner of ‘wokeness’ spread into the wider society and became cornerstones of the civil rights movement — something the far right has always hated and vowed to reverse. (As we all know, over the past decade, they’ve grabbed their golden opportunity and run with it.) But if we think about the deeper symbolism of ‘woke’ vs. ‘anti-woke,’ it’s clear that the far right and today’s GOP do not support liberal democracy or the social and philosophical ideals of the Enlightenment. Our representative democracy sought to incorporate Enlightenment ideals like rationality, individual freedom, equality, and the separation of church and state. Over the last 70 years, the U.S. made some (a few) significant inroads into actually achieving these goals — until the last 15 years or so. Since the presidency (2009–2017) of Barack Obama — the nation’s first and only Black president — our nation’s racists, White supremacists, and Christian nationalists have gone apeshit. They are furious about increasing equality, racial diversity, and inclusiveness (that is, about most Enlightenment ideals) and are now determined foes of liberal democracy. That’s the underlying rationale behind the fierce right-wing attacks on DEI. It must be said, without any exaggeration: they intentionally promote (overtly or covertly) ‘endarkenment’ and racist hate. Imagine: they actually prefer — and insist on — increased racism, misogyny, oppression of minorities, and oppression of LGBTQ+ folks. They love their racism, misogyny, and hatred, and do not want to let it go or help heal our society. The ultimate choice: openness and love vs. fear, anger, and hate In the bluntest psychological and psycho-social terms, the ‘anti-woke’ mob rejects open-minded, inclusive, compassionate, and loving states of being. Instead, they foster and cling to the opposite. Sadly — horrifyingly — they willfully choose to be closed-minded, mean-spirited, racist, and hateful, and thus choose an emotionally destructive, contracted state of mind and heart (that’s also incredibly destructive socially). Hmm… really?! In terms of overall human happiness and fulfillment, which sounds better: living an expansive, inclusive, compassionate, and loving life, OR ‘living’ in a shrunken, contracted state of closed-minded, violence-prone, racist hate? To me, this isn’t even a choice. Who in their right mind would ever choose a shrunken, ugly, hate-filled life? Yet, amazingly, tens of millions of modern ‘civilized’ Americans are choosing exactly that. I’m sorry, but this is just nuts! C-r-a-z-y, and ever crazier. It’s an insane and highly destructive choice. In reality — you know, the world and life we actually inhabit — the healthy, healing choice is clear. In every possible way, being ‘woke’ (in its original meaning) is far superior to being stubbornly ‘anti-woke.’ S0 — Hell, yeah! I support being awake, aware, and ‘woke’ anytime, anywhere! I’m definitely ‘woke’ — and proud of it. — This post was previously published on medium.com. Love relationships? We promise to have a good one with your inbox. Subcribe to get 3x weekly dating and relationship advice. Did you know? We have 8 publications on Medium. Join us there! Hello, Love (relationships) Change Becomes You (Advice) A Parent is Born (Parenting) Equality Includes You (Social Justice) Greener Together (Environment) Shelter Me (Wellness) Modern Identities (Gender, etc.) Co-Existence (World) *** – Photo credit: Nathan Dumlao on Unsplash The post Woke — and Proud of It appeared first on The Good Men Project. View the full article

🍏 Turn off iPhone analytics: Apple collects usage data and location info from your device to “improve services.” They say it’s anonymous, but why risk your privacy? Go to Settings > Privacy & Security > Analytics & Improvements and toggle everything off. Bonus: You’ll get a tiny battery boost since your phone won’t be uploading data in the background. The post Turn off iPhone analytics appeared first on Komando.com. View the full article

The two leaders showcased their countries’ ties with a symbolic gesture on the sidelines of the SCO summit in China Russian President Vladimir Putin and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi shared a ride in the Russian-made Aurus Senat presidential limousine following the main session of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Summit in Tianjin on Monday. The Aurus Senat transported the two men from the summit venue to a hotel for their official bilateral meeting. Modi said on X the leaders travelled together and added that his discussions with Putin are “always insightful.” Before the delegation-level talks, Putin and Modi had a one-on-one conversation lasting about an hour in the Russian presidential vehicle. ⚡️NOW: President Putin & PM Modi Arrive for 🇷🇺-🇮🇳 Meeting in China - After More than 30 Mins Talking in Putin's Aurus pic.twitter.com/DTKrvTrZ9R — RT_India (@RT_India_news) September 1, 2025 The Aurus Senat, also referred to as a “fortress-on-wheels,” is a full-sized, heavily armored luxury limousine produced by Aurus Motors, a Russian automaker that is a joint venture between NAMI, a Russian state research institute, Sollers, and the UAE’s Tawazun Holding. Social media posts with images of the two leaders went viral in India on X, and in China on Weibo, with several thousand users liking and commenting on the story. ❗️Trending on Weibo Right Now - PM Modi Taking a Ride in Putin's Car! Garnering thousands upon thousands and likes and comments, Chinese social media is abuzz with the Indian Prime Minister belting up with President Putin for talks at #SCO2025 pic.twitter.com/x8pJr8zQpO — RT_India (@RT_India_news) September 1, 2025 The Aurus Senat was created after Putin said that Russia should make its own presidential vehicles. The Russian president has been using an Aurus Senat as his personal presidential limousine since 2018, and the car has been available to other buyers since 2021, a report by Car Magazine said. A civilian version is available, limited to 120 units annually, and costs around 18 million rubles ($223,000). Its design is inspired by the Soviet-era ZIS-110 limousine. Putin gifted North Korean leader Kim Jong Un an Aurus Senat during his June 2024 visit to Pyongyang. View the full article

Taipei missed a March deadline to move its representative office from Pretoria as the two sides were negotiating a new deal South Africa is finalizing the relocation of Taiwan’s unofficial embassy from the country’s capital Pretoria to Johannesburg, Minister of International Relations and Cooperation Ronald Lamola has revealed. South Africa officially ended its diplomatic ties with Taipei in 1997, and recently, the department gazetted a notice for the relocation of the office from Pretoria to Johannesburg. Lamola confirmed that a notice has been gazetted for the transition of the Taiwan office, which will now be rebranded as the Taiwan Commercial Office in Johannesburg, adding that the move from Pretoria to Johannesburg has become a done deal. The latest relocation deadline was set for March 31; however, it was not met due to ongoing negotiations between the two countries regarding the terms of the agreement. Early this year, IOL reported that the South African government had initially ordered Taiwan to move its Pretoria office to Johannesburg in October 2024, but talks between the sides resulted in a new date of the end of March being set. ”We consider it done. We have gazetted the relocation to the City of Johannesburg. We have stated the reasons because our relations with Taiwan are at a commercial level and in trade. This is not just a South African phenomenon in many capitals across the globe; Taiwan is the commercial city – it is not some South African exceptionalism,” the minister said. The latest comes after the Taiwan government slammed Lamola for claiming that Taiwan has no representative office in the United States capital, Washington, DC, during a media briefing last Wednesday. In a statement, the Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs accused Lamola of making ‘false’ claims to justify South Africa’s unilateral abandonment of a 1997 bilateral agreement that aimed to downgrade Taiwan’s representative office. ”The Ministry of Foreign Affairs strongly refutes Minister Lamola’s claims, which not only contradicted reality but also highlighted South Africa’s grave lack of knowledge and misunderstanding of the international situation,” the ministry said. First published by IOL View the full article

Western blocs have “looked for enemies outside” while the East has stressed guarding against terrorism and separatism, Einar Tangen has said The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation’s (SCO) approach to security is radically different to the prevalent “aggressive” model in the West, a US seecurity analyst told RT on Monday. Commentator Einar Tangen made the comments shortly after the ten SCO members endorsed a key declaration calling for reforms and new principles in global governance that reject typical Western international relations practices. The SCO's focus differs markedly from Western blocs because they “look for enemies outside” and present a narrative of a “big bad wolf out there.” In contrast, “SCO is the exact opposite,” he stated. He explained that the SCO instead emphasizes threats “within our society with terrorism, separatism, extremism” that must be guarded against. Tangen remarked that the contrasting worldviews are consistent when Putin asserts “it’s time to do something about Ukraine. Remember, this always had to do with the security of Russia and the infringement by both Europe and the United States directly against their word of going into Ukraine.” He further contrasted Western and Eastern alliances. While the West’s byline “is kind of aggressive,” the message from groups such as the SCO and BRICS emphasizes “multilateralism, a multipolar world, fairness amongst all nations.” Tangen reflected on how peaceful intentions are often misinterpreted. “A thief always believes everyone else is a thief,” he said, noting that people tend to project their own behavior onto others. “There’s a lot of transference … where people just assume you’re like them and will act as they do.” He added that this mindset shapes much of Washington’s thinking. “They think as an empire, so they see enemies everywhere and maintain hegemony by keeping other countries in fear,” Tanged said. View the full article

When you hear the word “mistake,” what goes on in your head? For years, I heard that word and thought: “That’s me.” I confused doing something wrong with being something wrong. But that’s the lie we’re told. Society trains us to fear failure — as if it’s proof we’re unworthy. But what if we’ve misunderstood the role of mistakes entirely? Mistakes aren’t bad, and they aren’t wrong. Human beings have an inherent need to make mistakes, that we are fundamentally wired to stumble, to explore, and to learn from the consequences. What We Can Learn From Babies When we’re born, we are all blank slates. Babies explore the world through fresh eyes, not yet told by the world all the things they can and can’t do. One of the most significant milestones is learning how to walk. Before they can walk, babies push themselves up and fall over and over. And what do we do? We clap. We cheer. We don’t scold them when they fall — we celebrate it, because every fall means they’re trying. Every stumble is progress. Just like babies need to fall to learn, we still need stumbles — especially as teenagers, when our mistakes get more complex. The Hidden Cost Of Playing It Safe Teenagers get a bad rep for their impulsiveness, but biologically, it makes sense: their prefrontal cortex — the brain’s decision-making center — isn’t fully developed until age 25. I was the opposite. In high school, I didn’t party. I avoided social risks. I was what people called “wise for my age.” But wisdom wasn’t the whole story — I was scared. Social anxiety kept me sidelined. In some ways, I was behind the curveball. I missed out on a lot of messy, formative experiences. And maybe that’s the point: we crave mistakes not just to grow — but to connect. Why We Touch The Stove Our brains are wired for curiosity. Even when routines feel safe, something deeper urges us to explore. And why wouldn’t we? When we try new things, our brains release dopamine. That’s why a child touches a stove despite the warning — it’s not rebellion; it’s a craving to learn firsthand. We want new experiences, even if they sting. Not because we’re reckless — but because it’s how we grow. Every “mistake” is a doorway into deeper self-knowledge. Curiosity sets the stage for genuine growth, and sometimes that means a few falls before we truly find our footing. We flinch when we say the wrong thing in a meeting, when we send the email too soon. When we fall off a habit. When we choose the wrong relationship, the wrong job, the wrong words. But these aren’t signs we’re broken. They’re signs we’re brave enough to try. These moments of exploration, where we might trip or veer off course, aren’t proof of failure; they’re proof of our humanity. Mistakes Mean You’re Still In The Game Every time you mess up, stumble, or cringe at something you said or did… it means you’re alive. You’re showing up, experimenting, growing, and stretching beyond your comfort zone. That’s not a weakness. That’s progress in motion. I know the shame can feel heavy, like you’re the only one still fumbling. But you’re not. We all are. We’re all bumbling through this messy, beautiful life, learning as we go. Mistakes are the trail markers of growth. So please, stop waiting until you’re “ready.” Go try. Trip. Learn. Laugh. Then try again. Because the only real mistake is holding yourself back. — Previously Published on Medium iStock image The post What I Learned From Screwing Everything Up appeared first on The Good Men Project. View the full article

⛳️ Talk birdie to me: Forget 18-hole snoozefests. YouTube quietly turned golf into a content gold mine. During the pandemic, channels like Good Good exploded; now 75% of their revenue comes from merch, not swings. Paige Spiranac parlayed 4M Instagram followers into golf stardom, and even Bryson DeChambeau used YouTube to fix his image with 2.3M subs. The post Talk birdie to me appeared first on Komando.com. View the full article

Karol Nawrocki has insisted Poland needs “justice,” despite Prime Minister Donald Tusk having rescinded Warsaw’s request for compensation Polish President Karol Nawrocki has renewed demands for reparations from Germany for Nazi-era devastation, insisting that they must be paid in the interests of “justice and truth.” The reparations question has long strained Polish-German relations. The previous Law and Justice (PiS) government, in office from 2015 to 2023, demanded that Germany pay 6.2 trillion Polish zloty (around $1.5 trillion) for damage under Nazi occupation. That claim was then dropped by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who said Warsaw would no longer be seeking payments and would instead focus on improving relations with Berlin. Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski has suggested Berlin could “offer a creative decision” on how to account for Nazi crimes in a different way. Nawrocki, however, used a speech on Monday at a ceremony marking the 86th anniversary of the start of World War II to press Berlin once more. “Poland, as a frontline state, as the most important country on the eastern flank of NATO, needs justice and truth and clear relations with Germany, but we also need reparations from the German state,” he said at the Westerplatte memorial. “In order to build a partnership built on truth and good relations, we must deal with the issue of reparations from the German state which, as Polish president, I unequivocally demand, for the common good,” he added. Nawrocki said he hopes Tusk and the government will back the demands. Tusk, however, stated at the same ceremony that Poland must “understand who is our enemy” and cited the supposed threat from Russia. Moscow has repeatedly denied harboring any hostile intent towards the West, calling such claims “nonsense” meant to justify inflated military budgets. Berlin has acknowledged responsibility for Nazi crimes but has refused to reopen reparations, arguing Poland waived its rights in 1953 in an agreement with East Germany and that the 1990 treaty on German reunification settled the matter. Germany’s invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939 marked the start of World War II in Europe. The occupation lasted until 1945, when Soviet and local forces liberated the country. Poland lost around 6 million citizens during the conflict. View the full article

Things come up on short notice, leaving us scrambling to balance personal needs/responsibilities and professional responsibilities. Calling out of work doesn’t need to be difficult, but if you give the wrong reason, it could leave your boss doubting you and could even get you fired in some states. In this article, I explain 12 legitimate reasons to call out of work at the last minute, their pros and cons, how to communicate your absence to your boss/supervisor, and the necessary follow-ups, if any. The whole idea is to ensure you keep your employers in the loop in the right way and avoid any potential misunderstandings. Highlights Always check your company’s leave policies to ensure your excuse is valid and covered under these guidelines to avoid any potential issues. For excuses that may require verification, prepare the necessary documentation in advance to support your leave request smoothly. Where feasible, mitigate the impact of your absence by delegating essential tasks and providing colleagues with the information they need to cover for you effectively. 12 Valid Excuses to Call Out of Work 1. You’re sick. Feeling ill is one of the best excuses for missing work, as your company/boss will not want you in the office if you’re sick and possibly contagious. Pros Staying away from work while sick prevents the spread of disease to other co-workers. It gives you more time for recovery and ultimately helps you stay productive in the long term. Companies typically have policies for calling out sick, and your request will likely be granted. Cons Calling out sick often means more responsibility for colleagues. Some workplaces don’t offer paid sick leave, so missing a day could mean lost wages. There’s also the potential for extra work when you eventually recover. Irrespective of the potential cons, sickness is still one of the most legitimate excuses to get out of work. Putting yourself under extra pressure when you’re not feeling too well is not ideal. According to a survey by Bamboo HR, almost 90% of employees work through sickness or feel guilty when calling out of work. Rachel Suff, senior policy adviser at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD), says: “Remember, your health is paramount. Don’t feel guilty about calling in sick; a healthy you is a more productive you in the long run! “If you are really not well and your symptoms mean you are not going to be productive, it’s better to go off sick. You’re also not spreading germs around the workplace,” What to say “Hi, (Boss’s name). I am feeling under the weather and won’t make it in today. Hoping to be back tomorrow.” “Hi [Boss’s Name], I’m feeling unwell this morning with [brief description of symptoms, e.g., a severe headache, stomach issues]. I’ll be taking a sick day to recover. I plan to check my email periodically if anything urgent comes up. Thank you for your understanding. Best, [Your Name]” “Hi [Boss’s Name], “Hi [Boss’s Name], I need to take an urgent sick day today due to unexpected health issues. I’m seeking medical advice and will keep you informed about my situation. Please let me know if there’s anything urgent that needs to be addressed, and I’ll do my best to coordinate remotely. Thanks for your understanding, [Your Name]” Related Article: Use these sick-day email templates to request the day off hassle-free. IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER Some particularly strict/old-fashioned employers may want a doctor’s note as proof of illness when you return. The maximum number of paid sick leave days varies across organizations; be sure to understand yours. 2. You’re caring for a sick child or family member. Caring for a sick child or family member might even be a better excuse to miss work than calling in sick because it is a sign of responsibility and shows you can balance work and personal obligations. Pros It allows you to focus on helping your family member recover without work anxiety. Saves personal sick leave for when you’re ill. It could potentially strengthen your rapport with management through honest communication. Cons Depending on your company’s policy, you might not get paid for sick leave used for family members. When used too often, it might bring about a perception of unreliability. You may return to an increased workload as work accumulates during your absence. What to say “I’m sorry, but my child is feeling ill, and there’s nobody else who can care for them on such short notice. I’ll need to take a day to handle this emergency and return to work tomorrow.“ “Hi [Boss’s name], it’s [Your Name]. Unfortunately, my child woke up sick this morning and there’s no one else available to stay home with them. I need to take a day to care for them. I apologize for any inconvenience, and I’ll be back tomorrow.” Remember that family emergencies happen; most employers will understand and be sympathetic when you call in sick for medical reasons, whether personal or for a family member. IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER Provide enough information to justify your absence without oversharing private medical information about your family member. Verify whether additional documentation or specific steps are required upon your return. 3. You have a family emergency. A family emergency is another valid reason to call out of work, even on short notice. The typical boss will quickly accept this excuse to miss work without much questioning or doubt. They may not even ask when you’ll be able to return and instead say, “Just let me know if you’re able to come in tomorrow.” Pros Addressing a family emergency head-on reduces overall stress, leading to better focus when you return to work. It reinforces a positive work-life balance and family values. You usually won’t face many follow-up questions and won’t have to go into too much detail. Cons Potential for missed opportunities or falling behind on tasks. Uncertainty about some employer’s reaction or understanding of the situation. What to say “Good morning, I have a family emergency that requires my immediate attention. I won’t be able to make it to work today. I apologize for any inconvenience and I’ll keep you updated.” “Hi [Boss’s Name], I need to request an emergency day off due to a significant family issue that has just arisen and needs my urgent attention. Specifically, [brief explanation if you’re comfortable, e.g., “a close relative has been hospitalized and requires my immediate presence”]. I anticipate returning to work by [expected return date]. I’ll make sure to keep you updated. Thank you for your support during this difficult time. Sincerely, [Your Name]” IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER Manage expectations by letting them know your availability during your absence. Will you be reachable for urgent matters? Keep any relevant documentation or proof of the emergency, such as hospital records or legal documents, in case your employer requires verification. 4. Attending a funeral. Calling out of work at the last minute to attend a funeral is generally considered a valid reason, as funerals often occur unexpectedly and require immediate attention. Pros Funerals are generally accepted as a legitimate excuse, so you’re highly likely to get your absence approved. You don’t need to go into extensive details about the deceased or your relationship with them. Given the sensitivity of the situation, it is unlikely that an employer will question the legitimacy of the absence. Cons Some organizations have strict bereavement leave policies, limiting the number of days off and specifying eligible relations, which may not fully accommodate your needs. The timing of the absence, such as during critical projects, may lead to negative views on legitimate absences like attending a funeral. What to say “Dear [Boss’ name], I am writing to inform you that I have just received news of a family bereavement and need to take urgent leave to attend the funeral services. I will be out of the office starting today [insert date] and plan to return on [insert return date]. I have handed over my current tasks to [colleague’s name] and briefed them on the essential details to ensure continuity. Please let me know if there is anything specific you would like me to address before I leave. Thank you for your understanding and support during this difficult time. Warm regards, [Your Name]” IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER Last-minute notifications are sometimes unavoidable in these situations, but the sooner you can let them know, the better. Adhere to your company’s policies on bereavement leave. This might involve filling out specific forms or providing documentation, such as a funeral notice if required. 5. Childcare issues (sudden closure of a child’s school or daycare). Calling out of work at the last minute due to sudden childcare issues, like a daycare closure, is generally considered a very understandable reason. Pros Many employers recognize the importance of childcare and the challenges sudden closures create. If this is a rare occurrence and you have a good track record, your employer might be more forgiving of the short notice. You don’t have to go into extensive detail about the closure. Cons Repeated emergencies of this nature can lead to a backlog of tasks that are challenging to manage. In client-facing or critical roles, sudden childcare-related absences can cause significant, hard-to-mitigate disruptions. What to say “Dear [Supervisor’s Name], I wish to inform you that due to an unexpected closure of my child’s daycare, I need to take an urgent leave today to manage childcare. I have arranged for my tasks to be covered by [Colleague’s Name] and will ensure all critical duties are attended to remotely as much as possible. Thank you for your understanding and support during this unexpected situation. Best regards, [Your Name]” IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER Explore alternative childcare options with family, friends, or neighbors before calling out. Consider the criticality of your work tasks and deadlines. Can you work remotely while managing childcare for short bursts? 6. You need to care for a sick pet. While not one of the best excuses to get out of work, there can be situations where your pet needs immediate attention. In situations like this, simply let your employer know that your pet isn’t feeling well and that you will need to go to an emergency vet appointment or stay with them while you give them medication. Pros The excuse could appeal to your employer’s empathy. Your dedication to your pet might be viewed favorably, especially in organizations with pet-friendly policies. Cons Unlike human family members, some organizations may not recognize pets in their family leave policies. Frequent absences, especially for pet emergencies, might be flagged during performance reviews. What to say “I will be unable to come to work today, [date], due to a sudden and urgent situation with my pet. They require immediate veterinary care. I apologize for any inconvenience this causes. I will be checking emails periodically and can be reached at [phone number] for critical issues. I expect to be back in the office tomorrow, [date]. Thank you for your understanding. Sincerely, [Your Name]” “Dear [Boss’s Name], Due to an urgent health issue with my pet, I am requesting to take the day off today. This will allow me to monitor and care for them. I apologize for the short notice and inconvenience. Best, [Your Name]” IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER Before using this excuse to call out of work, you should weigh the urgency of your pet’s situation against work demands. Explore other options, like checking if a trusted friend or family member can check on your pet and provide basic care while you’re at work. 7. You have a last-minute dentist or doctor’s appointment. Next on our list of acceptable excuses to call out of work is a last-minute dentist or doctor’s appointment. Pros Missing work to attend a last-minute doctor’s appointment can address potential health issues early on. It could also mean less downtime in the long term when you miss work to attend a last-minute doctor’s appointment. Cons Your boss may ask why they were not informed sooner. There’s also the risk of perceived unreliability or lack of foresight from management’s perspective. What to say “Hi [Boss’ name], There’s something I want to get looked at urgently and my doctor/dentist had a last-minute cancellation and offered me an appointment today. Apologies for the short notice I hope to be back to work tomorrow.” “Hi [Boss’s name], it’s [Your Name]. An unexpected health issue came up and I need to see a doctor/dentist right away. I won’t be able to make it into work today. I apologize for the short notice and will keep you updated.” IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER You may need to provide a doctor/dentist’s note to back up your excuse. Always check your company’s policy on sick leave and doctor’s appointments. Be professional and apologetic, but you don’t need to disclose the specific details of your appointment. 8. You’re having car trouble. If you rely on your car to get to work and it is unavailable due to mechanical issues, you can inform your boss of the situation and get the day off. However, you may face follow-up questions like, “Can you take a bus? We really need you here today.” Thus, this excuse is only legitimate if there are no alternative means of getting to work. Pros Unaddressed car issues could be potentially dangerous; missing work to fix them prevents further complications. If remote work is not already applicable in your workplace, it could be a chance to demonstrate its feasibility and productivity. Cons Frequent car troubles could raise questions about your planning and management skills. What to say “Dear [Boss’s Name], I wanted to inform you that I am experiencing unexpected car trouble this morning and will not be able to make it to the office today. I am currently arranging for repairs. Thank you for your understanding. Best regards, [Your Name]” “Dear [Boss’s name], I will be unable to come to work today, [date], due to unexpected car trouble. My car broke down this morning and I’m currently waiting to hear back from a mechanic about repairs. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. I will be checking emails periodically throughout the day and can be reached at [phone number] if urgent. Best, [Your Name]” IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER Depending on your work situation, you may be allowed to work from home for the day or the rest of the week. If remote work isn’t applicable, your employer would expect you to explore alternative transportation options, such as public transport or ride-sharing services, for subsequent days. 9. You have a household problem. A household problem that requires you to remain home is one of the most straightforward and valid excuses to call out of work. Pros Taking a day off to get things fixed at home prevents small issues from turning into costly repairs. You’re less likely to be distracted at work when you are not worrying about unresolved household problems. Cons Some employers may view the issue as not serious enough, questioning the employee’s commitment. What to say “Dear [Boss’s Name], I am writing to inform you that I will be unable to come to work today, [date], due to an urgent home repair situation. I woke up this morning to discover a leak in my water pipes, and a plumber needs immediate access to my property to assess and fix the damage. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Best regards, [Your Name]” “Hi [Boss’s Name], I want to inform you that I will need to take a half day off today, [date], to receive an important delivery that requires a signature. Unfortunately, the delivery window is only available during work hours today. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. I have completed [mention completed tasks] and will delegate [mention tasks delegated] to [colleague’s name] to ensure they are covered in my absence. Kind regards, [Your Name]“ IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER You should be prepared to explain how the situation was unforeseen and that you reached out to inform them as soon as you could. To avoid the perception of triviality, be sure to communicate the severity of the issue and why staying back to fix it is important. 10. Mental health day. A mental health day is a day employees are allowed to take time off for self-care and mental well-being. I’ve had horrible jobs myself, and I understand having a feeling of panic in the morning when you’re simply overwhelmed and want to call out. Pros It demonstrates self-awareness and proactive self-care, which is needed for long-term productivity. This could potentially foster a more open and supportive workplace culture around mental health. Cons Risk of stigma or misunderstanding from management regarding the need for mental health days. Many companies have no formal policy for mental health days. What to say “Hi John, I am writing to request a personal day off to attend to my mental health. I have been feeling increasingly overwhelmed and need some time to recharge and ensure I can continue to perform at my best. I apologize for the short notice. I plan to take today off and return tomorrow feeling more refreshed. Thank you for your understanding and support. Best regards, [Your Name],” “Hi Luke, I will be unable to come to work today, [date], to prioritize my mental health. I’m feeling burnt out and need a day to recharge and refocus. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. I have completed [mention completed tasks] and will ensure [mention loose ends] are covered before the end of the day, if possible. I will be checking emails periodically and can be reached at [phone number] for urgent matters. I expect to be back in the office tomorrow, [date], feeling refreshed and ready to contribute. Thank you for your understanding. Kind regards, [Your Name]” IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER More and more companies are accepting the idea of a mental health day without a specific reason or emergency. Although this excuse is best if requested one or two days in advance, you can still request a mental health day on short notice. 11. You have a religious holiday/event. If your employers don’t recognize your particular religious holiday, don’t shy away from bringing it up, as it is another valid excuse to call out of work. Pros Many countries have employment laws that protect employees’ right to observe religious holidays. Most organizations list diversity as a priority; hence, it will likely be granted. Cons A lack of understanding/appreciation of certain religious practices may be a constraint. What to say “Tomorrow is a big day for followers of my religion. To celebrate, there is an event that I’ve just been told I must attend. I know this is very short notice, but I hope you appreciate that my presence is important for my family and me.” IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER Your employers are probably bound by HR policies to respect and accommodate each person’s religious beliefs. If you can, you should inform them beforehand rather than at the last minute. 12. Unsafe weather conditions. In unsafe weather conditions, you should prioritize your safety and communicate the situation to your employer. They will most likely understand the situation because no employer expects you to brave hazardous weather to come to work. Pros Taking a safety-first approach reduces the risk of accidents or injuries from attempting to commute in hazardous conditions. You’re unlikely to face any questions as hazardous weather conditions are typically unforeseen and beyond your control. Cons Weather impacts may vary across different places, which may cause differing perceptions of the need for weather-related absences. What to say “I may be unable to come to work safely today, [date], due to the [mention weather condition, e.g., heavy snowfall] in the forecast. I am concerned about the potential hazards during my commute and while traveling throughout the day. If the weather worsens or road conditions become unsafe, I won’t be able to make it into the office. I’ll check in again later this morning with an update on my ability to come in or work remotely.” “Dear [Boss’s Name], Due to the severe weather conditions forecast for today, including [mention specific conditions, e.g., heavy snowfall, ice, flooding], I am concerned about the safety risks associated with commuting. If possible, I would like to request to work from home to ensure my safety and maintain productivity. I am fully prepared to handle all my tasks remotely and can be reached at any time via email and phone. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, [Your Name]” IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER If feasible, offer to work from home or reschedule your duties for when conditions improve. Your employer is legally obligated to prioritize your safety. Don’t hesitate to voice concerns if you feel unsafe commuting in severe weather conditions. Dawn D. Boyer, CEO of D. Boyer Consulting, says there should be no reason for an employee to lose their job because they couldn’t make it to work due to unsafe weather conditions “unless the employee consistently uses it as an excuse to avoid coming to work and has run out of PTO, and/or there are other mitigating factors.” Best Practices for Notifying Employers You’ll Be Missing Work Unexpected absences happen, but keeping your employers informed the right way is important. Here are five best practices to ensure a smooth process whenever you need to call out of work. Communicating with the employer as soon as possible: The earlier you can communicate your absence to your supervisor, the better they can adjust tasks and schedules. This helps minimize disruption in workflow. Adhering to the company’s protocols: Many companies have established procedures for calling out of work. You should follow these procedures to ensure everything is documented properly and avoid confusion. Suggesting potential solutions to minimize disruption caused by your absence: If you can, offer suggestions to minimize the impact of your absence. This might take the form of creating a handover document to bring the person covering for you up to speed. Staying in touch and giving updates: Depending on the circumstances surrounding your absence, it might be helpful to check in from time to time. This is especially important if you’re out for an extended period. Doing this shows your commitment to work and keeps your employer informed. Does Calling Out of Work on Short Notice Leave a Negative Impression? Everyone misses work from time to time, and it’s not necessarily a bad sign that you need to take an unexpected day off. However, if you fail to inform your employer early enough and cause difficulties such as scheduling issues, then it could leave your boss upset. You shouldn’t feel bad about telling your employer you need a day off for any of the reasons above, but give them as much notice as possible. Also, avoid making it a frequent habit to call out. Can You Get Fired for Calling in Sick? In many states, work is considered to be done “at-will,” which means an employer can technically fire you for calling in sick. However, each state provides different rights to employees. No matter where you live, it’s unlikely that an employer will fire you for taking one sick day or calling out of work occasionally. How Often Can You Call Out of Work? It is difficult to give a one-size-fits-all answer to how often you can call out of work. Here are some considerations to have in mind: Employer policy: Understand your company’s sick leave policy and procedures for absences. Job requirements: Consider how crucial your physical presence is for your role. If essential, have a backup plan. Work flexibility: Explore possibilities of remote work if your job allows it. Communication: Be honest and open with your manager about your needs. Build trust: Consistent good work helps establish trust for occasional absences. What Not to Say When You Call in Sick To wrap up, here are a couple of mistakes to avoid and bad reasons for calling out of work. First, you never want to say anything that suggests you failed to plan ahead or that you didn’t let them know promptly. Don’t give a reason that sounds like it’s something you would have known about days before. The other big mistake to avoid is overexplaining. You don’t need to share every detail when you explain why you can’t come to your job for one day. If you say you have a sick child, you don’t need to share every symptom as proof that they’re not feeling well. If you’re going to say that you’re sick, you don’t need to try to cough on the phone or sound miserable. Just be clear and direct, give the general excuse/reason that you’re going to use to miss work, and then stop talking and see how your boss responds. When you call out of work, it’s often better to say less. Bad Planning There are many good excuses to call out of work; poor planning is not one of them. Poor planning is not a quality any boss wants to see in their employee. Of course, some emergencies are understandable, but reasons like missing the bus or forgetting to set the alarm aren’t likely to go down well, especially when it happens too often. Forgot You Had A Shift Forgetting you had a shift is surely not one of the good excuses to miss work on short notice. Everyone makes mistakes. But forgetting that you had to go to work or had a shift to attend points, once again, to bad planning. Your best bet, in this case, would be to apologize profusely. Work Conflicts Conflicts with coworkers can be hard to deal with. However, your employer will likely have little patience for you if you miss work due to an interpersonal conflict. Talking things through with your employer or coworker might be a better solution. — This post was previously published on CareerSidekick. *** Subscribe to The Good Men Project Newsletter Email Address * Subscribe If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today. All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS. Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here. Photo credit: iStock The post 12 Best Excuses to Miss Work (Last Minute/Short Notice) appeared first on The Good Men Project. View the full article

“I’m hurting,” says the heart. “I’ll protect you,” says the brain. “How?” asks the heart. “I’m breaking.” “I’ll hold the pieces,”says the brain. “For how long?” asks the heart. “Until you’re ready to pick them up,” says the brain. The conversation of denial. My friend and I have been talking recently. She’s upset over a guy. We lament over her angst. We share stories. We bond. We agree we both refuse to accept our truth. Because it’s not what we want. It’s not what our hearts want. I chose denial at the end of my marriage. It was a conscious choice. I realized I didn’t want to give up on my husband. But I didn’t realize I was lying to myself to hold onto him. I wasn’t entirely aware of the facets of denial. The lies we tell ourselves when love is failing. We choose denial to protect our hearts. We don’t want to give up on someone we love. We don’t want to lose them. We don’t want this to be our truth. It’s too painful to digest. Our brain makes a deal with our heart. I’ve been in denial again this past year. I now fully understood the pact between my heart and brain. I’ve sensed their protective instincts. I knew they had my back. I knew they were watching out for me. I knew they understood my limitations. They didn’t want me to suffer. I let them rescue me. I believe our denial comes with mile markers. There are 3 denial mile markers. We either have a date in mind, a specific action, or an endless agenda. It’s something we think may move the needle of the person we care about. The one we choose not to let go of. Even when it takes us down. The Destination Mile Marker Denial in the form of a calendar based timeline. My recent denial falls under this category. I selected a timeframe. I did this consciously. I projected into the future. I had my own reasoning and rationale for this. It was part soft landing, and part seeing how things might pan out. I missed a man. I told myself if what I felt between us was real I would see him again. Distance wouldn’t erase it. I felt there was a truth in what we shared, and the truth is hard to deny. If I was right, it would come to light with time. As I approach the calendar milestone marker I set for myself, I’ve come to acceptance. My heart is finally catching up with my brain. I can put my denial behind me. The Sight Seeing Mile Marker Denial in the form of something we want to see or hear. A few of my friends fall under this mile marker category. Their denial isn’t timeline based. Their pain acceptance hasn’t been pushed ahead to a particular calendar date. It’s event based. The friend I was chatting with has chosen this denial. It’s in the form of something she expects a man to do. She is waiting to see if he prioritizes her. If he will choose her rather than playing the field. There are other reasons people choose this type of denial. It could be hoping someone moves for you, overcomes an addiction, goes to couples counseling, etc. A specific action or proclamation that says I choose you. The Wanderer Mile Marker Denial in the form of never-ending timeline and optimism. I chose this endless mile marker at the end of my marriage. I chose (albeit unconsciously) to simply live in denial…for ages. I wouldn’t allow the reality of my marriage failing. I rejected it. I didn’t give myself a timeframe, or a specific event to end my denial. I optimistically and spiritually wouldn’t permit my truth. I believe all things are possible. This was my optimism. My faith reinforced that all things are possible. Miracles can happen. A marriage can be saved. A spouse can care, and change bad behaviors. And lastly, I didn’t comprehend the massive scope of denial. I didn’t understand I had slipped into protective mode. I thought I was doing the right thing by endlessly refusing to give up on my husband, and our marriage. I thought I was being the tenacious problem-solving fixer that I had always been. My friend and I feel things deeply. Maybe too deeply. We both understand that we’ve been in denial. It was too painful to come to acceptance any other way. She’s still waiting for her event mile marker. I’m grateful the calendar has arrived at my denial mile marker. The calendar has called my bluff. My heart is ready, my brain’s been waiting. The tortoise has finally caught up to the hare. I can no longer kid myself. I can no longer lie to myself. I once wrote, “We lie to ourselves to delay our pain. It’s the tool that eases us into heartbreak. It’s the untruth that delays the discomfort. The hurt saved for a rainy day when we finally ingest it and cry with the skies.” My Irish Catholic mother always said, “This too shall pass.” One of two signature comforts she doled out to us in times of angst. Eventually things do pass. We either pick up the pieces, or we leave them behind. — This post was previously published on medium.com. Love relationships? We promise to have a good one with your inbox. Subcribe to get 3x weekly dating and relationship advice. Did you know? We have 8 publications on Medium. Join us there! Hello, Love (relationships) Change Becomes You (Advice) A Parent is Born (Parenting) Equality Includes You (Social Justice) Greener Together (Environment) Shelter Me (Wellness) Modern Identities (Gender, etc.) Co-Existence (World) *** – Photo credit: lhon karwan On Unsplash The post We Choose Denial to Protect Our Hearts appeared first on The Good Men Project. View the full article

📞 What’s your emergency? America’s 911 centers are so short-staffed they’re outsourcing some calls to a robot. A startup named Aurelian (because of course) raised $14M to let AI handle non-emergencies like parking rage and stolen fanny packs. It’s live in over a dozen cities and counting. The post What’s your emergency appeared first on Komando.com. View the full article